By referring closely to J B Priestley’s account of Bradford, explain :: English Literature

By referring closely to J B Priestleys account statement of Bradford, explainwhat he considers gave the city its particular character at the judgment of convictionhe was piece of music.J.B. Priestley, in his writing about Bradford, believes its charactercomes from, what might appear like, conflicting ideas. These ideascontribute to what Priestley calls Bradfords odd quality.The character of Bradford, in 1933, when Priestley was writing, was do up of two extremes, sectionalism and that of a cosmopolitancity. Provincialism remained in Bradford, firstly because the railwaywent to Leeds and non to Bradford and on that pointfore the city didnt mystifymuch new trade, such(prenominal) as any other manufacturing and/or greatereducational opportunities. As this was non the case and the railwaywent to Leeds instead of Bradford, the main job character in Bradford wasthe woollen industry, as it had already been for generations. All overBradford t present would befool been spinning mills where raft wereemployed to work rattling long and unsociable hours for very little pay.Another reason why provincialism remained in Bradford was because thewoollen employment was what the people were used to. For generationsin Bradford the woollen trade is what the local residents hold in beenaccustomed to and they enjoyed it. In mid-thirties when I am talking about,the peasants in the outskirts of Bradford would commute into Bradfordon the trams. This miscellanea of Bradford (the woollen industry etc.) is allthey get by and understand about life. This dash of living is all thatcomes naturally to them. I feel that the people who lived and workedhere in Bradford became very insular they did not look beyond theirexperience. This is what unplowed provincialism a reality in Bradford.There is a tie more about Bradford that I harbourt already explained,digression from provincialismA contradicting view of Bradford, to the above, is that the city wasvery based more or less cosmopolitan ideas and mindsets. Some people neverventured further than twenty or thirty miles out of Bradford whereas,others would fall in traveled to, what would seem to regularBradfordians, the closure of the universe, selling and buying woollenproduce. Although they had traveled the world, gained moreunderstanding and drive more intelligent, when they returned toMarket Street, Bradfordians would never have changed as, say Londonerswould have. They still remained their corresponding selves. When you metsomeone from Bradford you would think they had only travelled as faras York or Morecambe, but in material fact they might have been toBy referring closely to J B Priestleys account of Bradford, explain English LiteratureBy referring closely to J B Priestleys account of Bradford, explainwhat he considers gave the city its particular character at the timehe was writing.J.B. Priestley, in his writing about Bradford, believes its charactercomes from, what might seem like, co nflicting ideas. These ideascontribute to what Priestley calls Bradfords odd quality.The character of Bradford, in 1933, when Priestley was writing, wasmade up of two extremes, provincialism and that of a cosmopolitancity. Provincialism remained in Bradford, firstly because the railwaywent to Leeds and not to Bradford and therefore the city didnt getmuch new trade, such as any other manufacturing and/or greatereducational opportunities. As this was not the case and the railwaywent to Leeds instead of Bradford, the main job type in Bradford wasthe woollen industry, as it had already been for generations. All overBradford there would have been spinning mills where people wereemployed to work very long and unsociable hours for very little pay.Another reason why provincialism remained in Bradford was because thewoollen profession was what the people were used to. For generationsin Bradford the woollen trade is what the local residents have beenaccustomed to and they enjoyed it. In 1930s when I am talking about,the peasants in the outskirts of Bradford would commute into Bradfordon the trams. This kind of Bradford (the woollen industry etc.) is allthey know and understand about life. This style of living is all thatcomes naturally to them. I feel that the people who lived and workedhere in Bradford became very insular they did not look beyond theirexperience. This is what kept provincialism a reality in Bradford.There is a lot more about Bradford that I havent already explained,aside from provincialismA contradicting view of Bradford, to the above, is that the city wasvery based around cosmopolitan ideas and mindsets. Some people neverventured further than twenty or thirty miles out of Bradford whereas,others would have travelled to, what would seem to regularBradfordians, the end of the universe, selling and buying woollenproduce. Although they had travelled the world, gained moreunderstanding and become more intelligent, when they returned toMarket Street, Bradfo rdians would never have changed as, say Londonerswould have. They still remained their same selves. When you metsomeone from Bradford you would think they had only travelled as faras York or Morecambe, but in actual fact they might have been to