Social Psychology: Eyewitness Testimony Accuracy

Social PsychologyEye escort Testimony AccuracyNameProfessorSchoolTable of ContentsIntroduction 3Hypothesis 4Methods 5Eyewitness Testimony 6Perception 7Acquisition point in condemnation 8Retention Stage 8Retrieval Stage 13Results /Conclusion 14Bibliography 17IntroductionIn all criminal , polite and administrative trans inciteions , show is necessary to present a quiticular position . Evidence is defined simply as a check of a particular particular . There be tercet kinds of say that may be presented in act to splay a particular situation . These are : a ) determination or real bear witness b ) documentary evidence c ) testimonial evidenceObject evidence refers to any clear prey that may rehearsed to prove a particular item . Documentary evidence refers to the contents of the document that is presented in salu te to prove a particular circumstance Testimonial evidence is that kind of evidence that makes drug abuse of testimonies of witnesses or the victims or the take to task as evidence to prove a particular fact (Andrew M . ColmanUnder the Federal Rules of Evidence , the only requirement for an turn down evidence to be admissible in court is that it mustiness be relevant to the facts in issue and that it is not excluded by the Rules . On the other lot , there are much requirements prior to the admissibility of testimonial evidence . It is safe to conclude that lawfully , of the three kinds of evidence , the object evidence is considered as superordinate word and more(prenominal) than reliable . It is said that object evidence speaks more eloquently than a hundred witnesses . On the other hired hand , the testimonial evidence is considered the least reliable among the three kinds of evidenceHowever , the attribute opposite happens inside the courtroom . The juries and judges treat witness testimonies and d! enominations as compelling evidence ( Errors in Eyewitness assign Procedures ) Some authors even say that jurors overestimate the accuracy of eyewitness testimony .

In a study conducted by Loftus and Doyle (1992 ) simulating the verdicts in a mock running , they found that in the effort where there was no eyewitness only 18 gave over-the-top verdicts While the guilty verdicts increased to 72 if an eyewitness denomination is added ( Errors in Eyewitness identification Procedures ) This emphasis the swing that happens in every trial when there is an eyewitnessFurther , in an article earn Eyewitness Identification Proc edures Recommendations for Police Line-ups and Photo spreads a cases involving the use of eyewitnesses as basis for conviction was evaluated . Of these 40 cases , 36 cases or 90 was later reversed proving that eyewitnesses have falsely rear the suspect . These data make eyewitness identifications a high-priced risk to the administration of justice in our country (Barbara dungaree McAtlinThis research will limit its discussion on the first of false identifications by eyewitnesses during law of nature line-ups . I contract to prove that if not properly administered eyewitness identification in police line-ups may be very risky on the part of the suspects and may lead to the witness pointing at a soulfulness other than the real culprit HYPOTHESISA witness is do to get hold of which among the suspect in...If you want to get a full essay, baseball club it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full es say, visit our page: write my paper