malvo case, death penalty :: essays research papers fc

Malvo Case Beltway SniperIssueShould minors be define to goal for the crimes they commit?Relevance to Case At HandMalvo was 17 when him and his abetter _or_ abettor (Muhammad) killed more than four people in a sniping spree. I conceptualize that Malvos major influence was Muhammad, 41. Malvo did most of the shooting, but as an boyish it may non seem fair to be put to death. As a minor, it is so easy to get manipulated and peer pressured into doing things that occur entirely because their maturity level has not developed. At ages 16-17 a juvenile is allay immature and does things without realizing the seriousness of the consequences. At the same time there ar juveniles that are leaders of gangs and have a lot of criminal confined on injuring or permanently harming others. How can we separate the children that do not know the seriousness of crimes they have done, from children that matured a lot straightaway and know the seriousness in everything they have done?Research Fin dingsIt is a tough decision when it comes to determining whether a juvenile should be put to death or not. Research has in any case claimed that the human brain is not fully developed, specifically the frontal lobe, until the early 20s. (Cassel, 03) All of our sources of organization, planning, strategizing, judgment, reasoning, and thirst control is not fully complete till the ages of 21 or 22(Cassel, O3). Malvo was 17 at the time of the murders and very easily persuaded by Muhammad. Should he be accountable for his mistakes by death or is it possible that a weekly dose of counseling and jail time be seen as a better punishment for him. Adolescents as a group, even at the age of 16-17, are more impulsive than adults. They underestimate risks and overvalue short-run benefits. They are more susceptible to stress, more emotionally volatile, and less equal to(p) of controlling their emotions than adults.(Cooperman, 04) If a child is raised around force-out because its likely for t he child to engage in violent behavior. This also depends how the violence is staged in front of the child. In this case, Malvo was taught violence alternatively than just seeing it second hand. This makes it more likely for Malvo to do violence acts, but how much of this is really his fault? He is still a minor and has not reached any stage of maturity.